Four faults were leaving restaurant days out of balance — one in the
data, three in the arithmetic. Measured over ninety days on a restored
copy of production (210 clients, 18,900 client-days): 1,258 days out of
balance and $69,560.10 becomes 123 days and $2,970.35, of which only 33
are above ten cents.
1,135 days repaired, none knocked out of balance, and not one
already-balanced day altered — verified line by line (category, side,
amount to the cent, account), not just on each day's bottom line.
THE DATA FAULT
Ten Square locations were configured against two client records each.
Sales orders scoped their identifier by client; refunds, card payments,
payouts and cash-drawer shifts used the bare Square id. Those attributes
are :db.unique/identity, so both clients' imports resolved to a single
entity and the last writer won — 3,387 refunds, 4,069 payouts and 2,628
cash-drawer shifts changed hands over time, across 19 client pairs of
which only 10 are visible in today's configuration.
Worse, one payment could belong to two orders. :sales-order/charges is
:db/isComponent, so removing a voided order cascaded into payments the
other client still needed.
Fixes: client-scope the four key schemes; look the record up under both
schemes so the change deploys before the migration finishes; and a
migration that gives every order its own payment. Run over the whole
database that is 19,040,785 orders walked, 9,100,314 payments re-keyed
and 200,027 copied, ending with 17,047,142 payments scoped, none left to
rename, none unscopable, and no payment owned by more than one order.
Idempotent and resumable; about thirteen minutes.
THE ARITHMETIC FAULTS
- Refunded tips stayed on the books. get-tip summed tips by joining
through :sales-order/charges, so a return-only order — no tender to
join through — contributed nothing while its reversal sat unread on
:sales-order/tip. Additive, not substitutive: where an order does have
a tender the tender is the correct source.
- Service charges were collected but never earned. Nothing read
:sales-order/service-charge. Now credited for Square orders only, both
signs, behind summary-service-charges.
- A refund on a day with no sales had nothing to offset it. Refunds are
credited on the day the money goes back; the return that offsets them
is read from that day's orders. get-returns now falls back to the day's
refunded total, but only where the client recorded no sales orders at
all — with no orders there is no order-derived return to double-count
and no trading day can be moved. Behind summary-refund-only-returns.
Both flags are off by default, so deploying this changes nothing until a
client is opted in. docs/2026-08-15-sales-summary-rollout-plan.md has the
steps.
SUPPORTING
- Install schema attributes before the tuples that compose them. A tuple
in schema.edn is built from an attribute in cloud-migration-schema.edn,
so every test fixture died in setup — very likely why sales summaries
had no tests before this.
- Log each day's imbalance and its suspect lines.
- Bound the dirty-summary scan to one client: 1,321 ms to 5.6 ms.
- compare-sales-summaries lives in test/clj as auto-ap.tools.* — it is a
verification harness, not part of the running application. Its
docstring now warns that d/as-of cannot be used to compare summary
amounts: :ledger-mapped/amount, ledger-side and account are
:db/noHistory, so a recomputed summary reads back with its amounts
absent and looks like a legitimate balanced day.
28 tests, 65 assertions.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The statement no longer prints "Reel Produce" as text (only
orders@reelproduce.com), switched to MM/DD/YYYY dates, and moved the
invoice number into an "INV #..." transaction description, so no
template matched and the file fell through to the glimpse2 fallback.
Adds a QuickBooks-statement-style template (same shape as Suncrest /
Ocean Queen) keyed on reelproduce.com + Statement, placed after the
existing Reel Produce statement template so the old layout still wins.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Validates existing template correctly parses multi-page invoice with:
- Invoice number 03882095
- Customer identifier NICK THE GREEK
- Account number 600 VISTA WAY
- Total of $946.24
- customer-identifier field: customer name (e.g., 'NICK THE GREEK')
- account-number field: street address (e.g., '600 VISTA WAY')
- Combined they provide full customer identification with address
- Updated test to verify both fields and their concatenation
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Extract city/state/zip in location field
- Customer address now split across 3 fields:
- customer-identifier: customer name
- account-number: street address
- location: city, state zip
- All components verified in test
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Extract customer name in customer-identifier field
- Extract street address in account-number field
- Use non-greedy regex with lookahead to capture clean values
- Update test to verify both name and address extraction
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add new PDF template for Bonanza Produce vendor
- Template uses phone number 530-544-4136 as unique identifier
- Extracts invoice number, date, customer identifier, and total
- Includes passing test for invoice 03881260
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
