no need for transact-with-ledger.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
|
||||
* try again to see if we can get upsert-ledger into the same transaction, making it all or nothing
|
||||
* look for all usages of transact-with-ledger
|
||||
* propose-invoice should use upsert invoice as well
|
||||
|
||||
it looks like there are a bbunch of orrphaned customizations for accounts, breaking indexes
|
||||
upsertledger - matching transaction rule might not assign an account. Other things might not assign accounts. This is an assertion that is commented out. Determine consequence of disabling
|
||||
@@ -33,6 +32,7 @@ Just use a periodic request or event instead of a job for running balance cache,
|
||||
get rid of account-groups
|
||||
move to solr
|
||||
upsertentity Look at how address works on client save. There's agood chance that we should make saving a rel with only a temp id just resolve it to null
|
||||
new way to do backups
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user